Blog

Why do some families remain trapped in poverty across generations?

1. Individual capability
   B. Underutilising the economic ecosystem

C. Family environment and poor financial decisions

India today has substantially wider access to banking, micro-credit, government schemes, digital platforms, and information than in earlier decades. For example, by July 2026, PM MUDRA Yojana had sanctioned over 59 crore loans, illustrating the scale at which formal small-business credit has expanded. MUDRA now offers collateral-free institutional credit of up to ?20 lakh for eligible micro-enterprises. Loans worth ?40.07 lakh crore have been sanctioned since the scheme began.

1. Individual capability

• Opportunity opens the door; determination and capability enable a person to walk through it. For example, consider two delivery workers earning similar incomes. One learns to drive, obtains a commercial licence, and progresses to operating a taxi or commercial vehicle. Another continues doing the same low-paying work without acquiring an additional skill.
• A degree does not automatically produce income. Education provides knowledge; employable skills convert knowledge into income. An individual needs a skill someone is willing to pay for. For example, an electrician, plumber, welder, mechanic, computer technician, salesperson, or skilled machine operator may earn more than an unemployed graduate whose qualifications do not match available work. Therefore, the relevant issue today is increasing employability rather than education alone.
• The economy is changing through EVs, solar energy, digital commerce, automation, AI, and platform-based services. A skill that generated income twenty years ago may not provide the same opportunities tomorrow. Workers who continuously upgrade themselves are better positioned to move into higher-productivity work. A person who insists on doing only the work his parents did may remain trapped in a low-productivity occupation. Economic mobility often requires learning, migration, occupational change, and willingness to adapt. For example, a petrol-diesel automobile mechanic who learns EV diagnostics earns much more.
• Escaping poverty usually does not happen through one dramatic decision. It may require years of disciplined effort—learning a skill, saving small amounts, building experience, and gradually acquiring assets. For example, A daily-wage worker learns masonry, progresses to a skilled mason, becomes a small contractor, and eventually employs other workers. Thus, determination matters because small improvements sustained over many years can change the economic position of the next generation.
• MUDRA, Kisan Credit Card, SHG-bank linkage, agricultural credit, and other government-backed lending mechanisms enable availability of credit. The real differentiator is increasingly the ability to identify a viable opportunity, obtain appropriate finance, and use borrowed money productively. For example, consider two people who can access a ?2 lakh business loan. One uses it to purchase equipment for a repair workshop, develops customers, maintains accounts, and repays from business earnings. Another may hesitate to borrow because of uncertainty, or may enter a business without understanding demand/customer base and struggle to generate sufficient returns.
• Credit can finance an enterprise; it cannot create entrepreneurial ability. Credit availability is useful only when someone has the confidence, competence, and business idea to use it productively. For example, a skilled cook can remain a salaried restaurant employee throughout his career or, after gaining experience and assessing demand, use savings and credit to establish a small catering operation. The difference is not simply availability of money. It can also involve initiative, business judgement, willingness to accept calculated risk, and persistence.

2. Underutilising economic ecosystem

• When individuals move from low-productivity work to acquiring relevant skills, they can access higher-productivity employment, earn better incomes, build savings, and gradually create productive assets and long-term financial security. For example, A casual agricultural worker may work extremely hard but earn much less annually than a skilled machine operator working in an industrial cluster.
• Jobs and markets are not distributed equally. Industrial clusters, large cities, and economically active districts usually provide more customers and employment choices than remote regions. For example, A skilled electrician in a prosperous industrial city may have continuous work. An equally capable electrician in a remote village may receive only occasional work. This explains why roads, industrial corridors, internet connectivity, and urbanisation can improve economic mobility.
• We know that Indian farmers have small and marginal holdings. The latest comprehensive Agriculture Census available reports that roughly 86% of operational holdings are small and marginal (below 2 hectares). This fragmentation means that individual farmers often produce relatively small quantities for sale. Platforms such as e-NAM can connect farmers to a wider pool of buyers, while corporate buyers can offer larger markets. But large buyers generally look for consistent quantity, quality, grading, packaging, and timely supply. An individual small farmer may find these requirements difficult or uneconomical to meet. The challenge for small farmers is increasingly not the absence of markets but insufficient scale. By organising through FPOs and cooperatives, farmers can aggregate produce, reduce logistics costs, improve bargaining power and make better use of e-NAM and corporate market linkages.
• Agriculture has substantial institutional credit: by December 2024, 7.72 crore farmers had operative Kisan Credit Cards involving about ?10.05 lakh crore; concessional arrangements can reduce effective interest on eligible short-term agricultural loans for prompt repayment. The need of the hour is for cooperatives. For example, if there are 100 farmers in a village, each produces 20 quintals of onions for sale. Individually, each farmer has only a small lot and limited bargaining power. If they aggregate through an FPO or cooperative, they can collectively offer 2,000 quintals, undertake common grading and packaging, negotiate transport in bulk, and approach processors, organised retailers, or institutional buyers.

C. Family environment and poor financial decisions

• Parents transfer more than money to children. They also transmit discipline, aspirations, attitudes towards work, financial habits, and expectations. For example, A daily-wage worker may have limited financial resources but insist that his children develop communication skills, learn computers, participate in sports, acquire a technical skill, and explore careers beyond the family's traditional occupation.
• Income is important, but what a family does with its disposable income also affects long-term mobility. Let us consider two households each earning ?35,000 per month. Family A gradually builds emergency savings, develops children's capabilities, utilises government schemes for capital and medical aid, and invests in productive tools. Family B repeatedly incurs expensive consumer debt and accumulates few productive assets. After 10–15 years, their economic positions could be substantially different.
• Saving alone prevents vulnerability. Productive investment can increase future income. Most of the poor households do not live within their means. They spend their full income rather than accumulating assets like a small shop, livestock, etc. Therefore, once assets accumulate, the children do not begin economically from exactly where their parents began.
• Even when income rises, families must convert today's earnings into tomorrow's skills and productive assets. For example, suppose a family receives an additional ?5,000 each month. It could use part of the surplus for a systematic investment plan in a mutual fund or in children's capability development.